The specialists at Just Motor Law are leading experts in all types of motoring offences with extensive experience in representing clients faced with an allegation of failing to identify a driver.
This is a criminal offence that can hold significant penalties.
With the Just Motor Law service you have access to a specialist team of solicitors who carefully examine the circumstances surrounding the allegation all with the aim to establish a defence that could mitigate any potential penalties.
Failure to Identify a Driver
When a vehicle is suspected of being involved in an offence, the registered keeper of that vehicle will receive a Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP) by the Police.
Under Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 the registered keeper of the vehicle in question, is required by law to provide details relating to the identification of the driver at the time of the alleged incident. If this is not done within the required time limit provided the registered keeper of that vehicle can be prosecuted.
If you fail to respond to a NIP you may be summonsed for failing to provide information.
It is important to seek the advice of a specialist solicitor at the earliest opportunity to ensure you are aware of all the various options available.
The penalties for failing to identify a driver vary and will depend upon the individual circumstances of your offence.
Penalties can include:
What happens next?
As motor law experts we are on hand to advise and guide you through the legal process and will provide the evidence to put before the Court to secure the best possible outcome for our clients.
There are defences available depending upon the circumstances of the offence.
For example, if it is evident that you did not know, and could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained who the driver of the vehicle was, then you are not guilty and should not accept the charge.
Similarly if it is evident that you provided the requested information as soon as reasonably practicable, or that it has not been reasonably practicable for you to provide the information in the timeframe given, then you do not need to accept responsibility.
These defences are normally applicable to cases when the NIP was never received or in cases where more than one person could have been driving the vehicle at the time when the alleged incident took place and the registered keeper has no recollection of who was driving.
If you later accept that you were the driver at the time of the offence but the NIP deadline has passed, this does not automatically mean that you will be convicted of this offence.
In our experience, every case and the circumstances surrounding the offence is different. With the expertise of our Just Motor Law specialists you have access to leading litigators that will challenge any evidence the Crown Prosecution Service has to rely on by pinpointing potential loopholes and technicalities. There are various lawful technical defences.
It is important to remember that by seeking legal advice from the outset you can help to ensure that any complexities and potential implications are effectively managed. Having access to expert advice can bring peace of mind at a time when you face uncertainty and concerns for what lies ahead.
Simply complete the online enquiry form below and a member of our team will contact you.
Let Just Motor Law guide you on your legal journey.
I had 4 offences of failing to identify the driver all of which carry a punishment of 6 penalty points for each offence. After many months of pressure being placed on the CPS for their evidence, all 4 offences were dropped at court by the prosecution. I am so happy with the advice and representation received from Natali and Matt. Without them I would have been disqualified from driving for 6 months, would have lost my job and been unable to pay my mortgage!J. Mee